Popular Adult Education Theories
Behaviorism in Adult Education
BF Skinner is one of the most celebrated psychologists and is often compared to the more well-known Freud. Skinner was a behavioralist and his views, I find, are the easiest to begin with when first delving into behaviorism because most will find that their upbringing will be at the forefront of their thoughts when reading Skinner’s theory. Skinner felt that behaviorism should shape learning, and he challenged the idea of “inner freedom.” Instead, Skinner believed that learning could be linked to external forces (Anderson, 2010). Skinner believed that any behavior that was followed by a positive consequence would be more likely to occur again. The consequence with the positive effect is called a “reinforcer”. A consequence with a negative effect is a punishment. Skinners’ entire system and logic is based on what is called “operant conditioning”; which is the process of learning through reinforcement and/or punishment (Anderson, 2010).
Behaviorism, in my opinion, is a fundamental part of our learning process as living beings. We need behaviorism, especially operant conditioning, as this is how we learn from a young age what behaviors are acceptable and what aren’t.
Positive and negative reinforcement is used in parenting. Taking a phone away, giving an allowance, having an outing, being grounded to your room, these are all examples of positive or negative reinforcements that are used by parents across the globe. These techniques are used to teach our children to change their behaviors. To adjust to our expectations of them; to societal expectations of them. However, I don’t think that education can be reduced to being no more than training, than arranging certain stimuli to elicit predetermined responses. If that were true, then people wouldn’t seek to learn more than they are told. There would be no questions about what they’ve learned or why they are being asked to learn it. Humans are innately curious and tend to seek out new information on their own; without being asked to, without it being a requirement. Just because they want to know. This search for knowledge is education, and that squashes the question posed by Elias & Merriam (2005).
Elias & Merriam (2005) teaches us some of Skinner’s thoughts on education and society. Skinner believes an educational system can ensure the survival of individuals and of society. Furthermore, Skinner felt that education should produce people who can work with one another to design and build a society that minimizes suffering and maximizes the chances of survival (p. 1745). Based on Skinner’s ideas, education plays a huge role in the shaping of culture. Individuals learn how to survive in their environments by learning, being educated, and in doing so, their society survives. Different societies house different cultures, and each culture teaches their people different cultural practices and beliefs that are taught generation after generation. These teachings are what keep that culture alive and thriving. Without educating the next generation of people, those cultural practices and beliefs will eventually die off and just become a part of history.

Humanistic Learning Theory
Elias and Merriam (2005) teach us that one of the common elements of humanism is that human nature is naturally good. Humanists believe that humans are inherently good. Another element is freedom and autonomy. Humanists believe that humans are truly free creatures and that their behaviors are not determined by external forces (pg. 2232-2254). I can agree with humans being born naturally good. I do believe that we are born without any knowledge of “evil” or “bad” in this world. However, I can’t get behind humans being truly free creatures whose behaviors aren’t determined by external forces. I feel like this element contradicts that humans are naturally good. If humans aren’t affected by outside forces and we are born naturally good, then I would want an explanation for our full prisons and jail houses.
Agudo (2021) teaches us that Humanism is a philosophy that stresses the importance of human factors. It is rooted in the idea that people have an ethical responsibility to lead lives that are personally fulfilling while at the same time contributing to the greater good for all people. When Humanism to adult education (or education in general), there are five basic principles to follow:
-
Students should be able to choose what they want to learn.
-
The goal should be to foster a student’s desire to learn, and desire to learn on their own.
-
Grades are irrelevant. Self-evaluation is what is meaningful.
-
Feelings and knowledge are important to learning.
-
Schools need to provide students with a non-threatening environment so that they feel secure, and learning becomes meaningful and easier.
Agudo (2021) further teaches that humanistic educators oppose objective tests because they test the student’s ability to memorize and do not provide sufficient educational feedback. Much of an adult’s knowledge comes from personal experience and that experience comes with negative or positive feelings. These things can impact our learning.

Radical/Critical Theory
Elias & Merriam (2005, p. 3274) notes that Collins states that “a critical practice of adult education provides a context where shared commitments towards a socially more free, just, and rational society will coalesce. Ultimately, a vocation to adult education seeks to realize, as critical practice, a just state of affairs where education is determined through the practical interests of free men and women.” Essentially, it’s a coming together of people with likeminded thoughts and ideas on how to make the world a better place. How to stand up against and change things are viewed as unjust. Take on the world’s social issues, so to speak.
Elias & Merriam (2005, p. 3308) bring forward Stephen Brookfield and the articles he has written making a case for critical theory as a basis for a theory of adult learning and education. Brookfield seeks to bring ideology critique to the center of adult learning. Brookfield is advocating for a theory of social and political learning that would challenge ideology, recognize hegemony, and un-mask power. Brookfield goes on to explain that the problem that all political educators face, especially radicals, is how to respect the agendas that adults bring to a democratic negotiation of curriculum while contradictorily challenging these agendas by offering radically different politically contentious options for study.
